Edgar, can you enhance this?

December 17, 2009


An Brief, Honest Look At The Bad TV Shows I Watch

December 16, 2009

(coincidentally, these are almost all available on Hulu)

Legend Of The Seeker - I started watching this while unemployed. Now that I'm employed, I find myself not watching it. Meh. Epic fantasy quest, hot female companion (now two hot female companions), and that weird tall guy I will always remember from one of the Mad Max movies, and yet all I can say is "meh."

Stargate Universe - Not as schlocky as other Stargate shows, except in this case, that's a bad thing. As I've said before, it seems like they're trying to Battlestar Galactica-ize the Stargate franchise. Hell, it's practically blatant... A small group of people alone on a ship with intense struggles between civilian and military rule? Check. Did I mention that they're also constantly struggling with finding supplies to help them survive on their falling apart ship? Come on. The end of SG-1 took a decent dramatic turn, but like Buffy, it was a gradual change from schlocky comedy to drama. This might not be such a bad series were it not for the blatant Battlestar plot points, maybe... Or if they had started schlocky and slowly turned serious. Bah! It still has Robert Carlyle, and I'm still watching it...

FlashForward - Originally, I started watching this just because of John Cho. But I'm sort of into it. Sort of. What keeping me from being a real fan? Logic. I'm going to group this show into the same genre as Lost: a vaguely sci-fi mystery that slowly unravels over the course of the series, providing much drama. And, like Lost, the logic of the characters actions never fails to upset me. Now, the characters in this show do not seem to make as many stupidly illogical decisions, but they also have much less sci-fi mystery to deal with. So, it's a bit disappointing. I'll probably keep watching it at least until they kill off John Cho's character, though. And (not really a spoiler, due to it's vagueness) I was quite proud of the writers for adding the part where the FBI guy jumps off the roof.

It's Always Sunny In Philadelphia - Very, very good. I frequently find myself laughing heartily at this show, and I'm pretty sure everyone else will too. Or everyone else does too, already. Everyone's always talking about how 30 Rock is the best comedy on now, but I beg to differ... This show is the best comedy on now.

The Office - It took me a while to view this as a completely separate show from the UK Office. The UK Office is a really good (if really bleak) comedy... One of the best ever, in fact. This show, however, isn't. This is but a sitcom. A really good sitcom, mind you, but still, quite different. But once you accept that, it's possible to enjoy both.

Parks And Recreation - A similar sitcom style as The Office, but with a slightly different sense of humor. At first, I was quite disappointed, but I've come to enjoy it. Although I'm not sure how much of my willingness to watch this is due solely to Aubrey Plaza.

Community - My friend Jesse wrote a much better bit about this show than I can, and I agree with it completely... a sincere show that is actually good.

30 Rock - I think this show used to be pretty solid, but it much more hit or miss lately. It's unfortunate, since this show has provided some of the best laughs I've ever laughed, EVER. But now I've gone entire episodes with only a couple of chuckles. Bummer.

Better Off Ted - I had never heard of this show until Hulu told me it existed, but I'm glad I know of it. This is a rather sincere comedy, like Community. This show isn't great, but it is always pretty consistent.

Outer Space Astronauts - Another show I had never heard of until Hulu told me. This one is sort of crude (visually and thematically) and rough, but as a pretty big sci-fi fan, it's nice to see such a niche show as this: a show for sci-fi fans that pokes fun at sci-fi.

Dollhouse - I admit: I'll watch anything Joss Whedon puts his name on. I'm quite enjoying this show, even if it has felt a little all-over-the-place. It started out slow, and I was up for a slow build, but then it seemed like they kicked up the pace due to sagging ratings or something. This, too, was alright. Then they had an episode on the 1st season DVD release that took place in a dystopian future (and it was AWESOME), and now that show has changed pace and is rapidly approaching that future. Yet another huge change, but still quite welcome. As long as the show either stays in the place it's at or makes another progressive change, I'll keep watching. It's fun.

Fringe - I figured I'd hate this one, but watched it for the hot girl (and, I suppose, for Josh Jackson). Over time, I've gotten into it. Very X-Files-ish, I think.

Lie To Me - Tim Roth. I'll watch anything with him in it. Some of the drama is too blah, some of the proceduralness is too blah, and the episodic nature is not my thing in a drama. But I'm still watching it. I thing Tim Roth is the reason. His characters always have a darkness lurking underneath (or on top, if the role calls for it), and I think the writers are slowly realizing that and writing some more bad-ass plots for this darkness.

Trauma - When I first saw the adds, I thought it was a joke: someone took all the dramatic tragedies from ER and made a show out of it! But I watched an episode anyway (thanks, Hulu), and now I've come to look forward to this.

V - I can't take waiting a week between episodes. I'm not sure if this is because I really like the show, or because the episodes don't seem to cover enough in each one, or what. I'm digging this so far, although there have already been a few times I've been disappointed with a main characters logic, so who knows.

Mad Men - I just started this. I wish I had it on DVD. My current method of watching it really kills a lot of the visual neatness that I can tell the show has. Maybe I'll take a break until I get the DVDs from Netflix. But I'm digging this so far. Not as much as lots of people in the world, but it's alright.

I was watching Dexter, but I gave up on that once Netflix Streaming didn't have any newer episodes. Same with Californication.

I hear there's another season of Party Down coming... Is this true? That would make me very happy. Also, I'm quite looking forward to the new season of Doctor Who. And I wish there would be a new season of Torchwood, too, but I fear that might be totally dead. Are there any Doctor Who fans reading this who can advise me one way or another as to whether I should watch The Sarah Jane Adventures? The brief cameo I saw of the show in either Doctor Who or Torchwood (forget which) made it look a bit juvenile, perhaps.

Anyone have any recommendations for shows I should watch instead of any of these?


This is for Lin Swimmer (and the state of California)

November 21, 2009


What I've Been Programming Lately: Bash Scripts

November 15, 2009

As if I wasn't already in love with POSIX shells, the more Bash scripts I write, the more I love it. Thank you thank you thank you, Apple, for including a (mostly) standard Bash shell in OS X!

One of the latest scripts that I wrote is simple but extremely useful to me. It moves the most recent file in my ~/Downloads directory to the current directory. Simple, and it sure started that way, but I've tweaked it to work quite nicely. The default behavior is to tell me what the most recent file is and ask me if I want to move it ('y' moves it and any other key cancels). This helps me if I forget that I downloaded some other things since the one I wanted to move. It also keeps track of a history, and allows for undoing the last move (if I do mess up). Also, it has decent error handling to ensure that I don't accidentally overwrite an existing file or such. This script is called mvdl, and I may post it on Google Code or Github sometime soon.

The other script I've been having fun perfecting is called backupwithgit. After my recent infatuation with Git, I've been versioning like crazy. backupwithgit helps me version not-too-critical directories, like my ~/random-textfiles directory. I can set a few options in the script, then make a symlink called backuptxt (or whatever I want), and then anytime I type 'backuptxt' in the terminal from any directory, it'll add and commit everything in my ~/random-textfiles directory. To deal with another not-too-critical directory, I set a couple more options in backupwithgit and then make a new symlink with a different name, and I'm good to go again. Like mvdl, this script will also be showing up on Google Code or Github sometime soon-ish.

I honestly don't know if these scripts would be useful to anyone other than myself, but I'm perfectly willing to share them once I clean them up a little bit. (Honest... just a little bit. They're quite nice as is.) If you're actually interested and can't wait for me to clean them up and post them, let me know and I'll hook you up, although they're pretty trivial scripts.

(If you've read this far through this post, then you might be interested to know that I'm quite disappointed with Stargate Universe. It seems as though they're explicitly trying to Battlestar Galactica-ize the Stargate franchise.)


Cucumbers! Cabbage! Chick peas! Tahini! Happiness!

I honestly haven't much awesomeness to tell you about right now. Or at least no one shining bit of awesomeness. So, instead, I will mention many little bits of semi-awesome right now. And maybe a small rant or two. In no real order.


-----

I've been spending a lot of time playing with jekyll, a "a simple, blog aware, static site generator." With it, I can write webpages with Markdown formatting and then quickly generate a static site. First, I converted my internal websites into jekyll sites (I keep a few personal websites going on my computer for nicely formatted notes and quick references to things). But now I'm in the process of actually (and finally!) making a real "homepage" kind of website, which will be unveiled to the public sometime-ish. It's fun! So easy! And it's a fairly small and simple Ruby program, so it's a blast to mess around with the jekyll source code too.

-----

I really don't know why it took me so long to wrap my head around it, but I've finally started keeping my work version-controlled. For a while, I've known how to check out code with Subversion, Mercurial, Git, CVS (and probably other I'm forgetting), but that's about all I've been able to do. But now, thanks to a guide which was surely written with me in mind, Git for the lazy, I'm quite comfortable with all aspects of Git. Actually, I'm more than comfortable... I'm smitten. And since I keep as much stuff of mine as I possibly can in plain text formats, I'm able to keep so much of my stuff version controlled! This is definitely something I've always wanted, even though I didn't know it.

-----

Bad grammar has been a bit of a pet peeve of mine for quite some time, but normally I can overlook it. Hell, I used to participate in various forms of internet lingo way back in the day, and I still quite enjoy some of the turns of speech that come out of forums like 4chan. But lately, I've seen quite a few people I respect linking to articles with atrocious grammar. I'm not even talking about simply switching its and it's, but writing frequent needlessly-confusing sentence fragments and gigantic run-on sentences. Possibly even worse, there seems to be a rising trend of quoting tweets - as compressed and stunted as they are - verbatim on one's blog. My disdain of Twitter aside, take pride in your quotes, O Internet!

But what can be done? It seems as though when one attempts to correct someone's grammar, it's usually perceived as snobby or condescending. The corrector is derided as "grammar police" or a "grammar nazi." And it's been my experience that kind, private emails to the author are typically ignored. Every time that I think long and hard about this problem, the only solution I come up with is improved education in schools.

Just how horribly selfish is it to now care about school funding so that there are better blog posts for me to read?

-----

I may have mentioned this before, but after being mostly unemployed for almost a year, I now have a lot less free time than I had grown accustomed to. As such, I can't read all the feeds in Google Reader that I used to. This is a sad affair, this pruning of information. I used to be able to read it all - to know it all - but now, I have to pick and choose. To a certain extent, it feels like it did when I no longer worked at a music store and no longer knew what practically every single album being released sounded like. As someone who frequently forgets things, I loathe the feeling of not knowing, or more precisely, knowing that I would have known.

-----

I've completely forgotten how I heard of it, but my new go-to site for technology news is Hacker News, the communal news portion of Y Combinator, a venture firm. The site typically deals with web development news, but from time to time other bits of geeky news is thrown in as well. I quite love visiting the site itself instead of via RSS, since it has such a quick, minimal interface, and rather substantial comments.


Money In The Bank

November 07, 2009


I have a new favorite website. It's call Bank Notes. It collects bank robbery notes. Most of them are transcribed, not actual scans, unfortunately, but it's still pretty damn awesome.


A Simple Video About Real Life

November 05, 2009



(from the excellent source for disco-y videos and music, arawa.fm)


Love And Logic

October 28, 2009

[This is not what I intended to write about, but I suppose something is better than nothing. This whole NOT-spending-every-waking-moment-online thing I've been doing lately really killed my drive to blog, apparently.]

The other day, I worked with an Icelandic girl. I've heard Björk's accent before, and the accents of a few lesser Icelandic celebrities, and I've always found their accents pleasing. But now that I've actually talked to an Icelandic girl in person, I think I can say that the Icelandic accent has officially become my new favorite accent for a girl. The Irish accent had previously held that title.

-----

The other day, I saw a girl who I recognized from having seen her photo online. I've seen her at my work a few other times, and yet each time is very, very awkward.
  • First, she's extremely attractive. That, sadly, always makes things awkward for me.
  • Second, the whole online thing is weird. Before nerdiness was as accepted as it is today, I trained myself to avoid talking in public of anything remotely nerdy. I'm untraining myself these days, but still, if you mention a webpage to me in public, you might notice a quick flash of revulsion. Don't worry, it's (probably) not you, it's me.
  • Third, she's not the one posting herself online. Her husband is the photographer. She's not the main subject of his photos. In fact, she's probably in only 5-10% of them, if even that. Only someone like me who's been following her husband's photography for a couple of years would really have seen enough photos of her to recognize her as quickly and certainly as I have.
  • Finally (and this is the kicker): in several of the photos, she's (tastefully) nude. She's aware that her husband is posting nude photos of her and she's OK with it, but still...
So, my interactions with her are simply: smile a little too large, point her to her book, quickly look away.

-----

I just realized that now that summer is definitely over, it's officially been over a year since I had a girlfriend. Unofficially, I'm not even sure if that one counted as a girlfriend, so it could have been an even longer time. But honestly, I don't think it really bothers me. This isn't a dry spell so much as it is disinterest. Or, actually, I suppose I've been interested, but I've just let logic get the better of me. Lately, the girls I've been most into have been totally totally wrong for me. The aforementioned photographer's wife. The ditzy, annoying blond. The model-hot party girl. The painfully naive girl I only talk to because I like her hair. The lesbian customer with the androgynous girlfriend. These are the girls I've contemplated asking out lately. What the hell is wrong with me? Either I need to get my logic synchronized with my lust, or I need to ignore one or the other. Until I start doing either, I'm fine being alone. Hell, I have been getting a lot of programming done lately, after all...


This Blog Is Brought To You By Germans Who Can't Pronounce Massachusetts

October 15, 2009


Goth Day, part 2, perhaps? The fashion issue

October 05, 2009

Holy shit. I'm kicking myself for not having thought of this myself:


Waders as fashion! So silly that it's super awesome! And she makes it work, with that awesome sweater. Oh, I suppose according to my brief internet searching, Prada may or may not have featured waders on the runway before. Bah. Whatever. I'm still giving props to this girl. Hmmm, also, according to slightly more searching, women in waders is a fetish calendar series. Fine, whatever. I'm STILL giving this girl credit, because until just now, waders, to me, had always been this:



This is what happens when I listen to industrial music for several hours

Apparently, I make "art":

I think it started when I listened to the latest song posted on Arawa FM. And then I listened to it again. And again.... And again a few more times. Meanwhile, I was looking at every single photo on Rankin's website. Then, while still looking at Rankin photos, I happened across this Front 242 song I had never heard on Constant Siege. And I listened to that over and over too. And for some reason the concept of listening to Front 242 in a Camero stuck in my mind. Then I found myself listening to the whole Ministry - Twitch album. And then those ZYX and Front 242 songs again. And then I downloaded a few Front 242 albums.

Then, before I knew it, I had downloaded a ton of Camero photos and turned them into what you see above.

Yes, this is embarrassing.
Take that, INTERNET.


To Boldly Be Sad Where No Man Has Been Sad Before

September 27, 2009

Well, not exactly. I suppose someone else was sad first, for they made the site: U.S.S. EXCALIBUR MEMORIAL.


Go there. Go there now.

But be prepared to be saddened, as I was, for that is a memorial site to dead Star Trek actors. At the top, it's got the biggies, like DeForest Kelley and James Doohan, but then it proceeds to list what can only I imagine is a complete list of everyone else who ever acted on any Star Trek series and is now deceased.

I dare any Star Trek fan to scroll through that list and not tear up. Especially you TOS fans.

What really got me, though, was the actors who you know mostly from other things, such as...

...Kevin Peter Hall
(who played both the predator in Predator and Harry in Harry And The Hendersons)


...David Graf
(who played Officer Tackleberry in the Police Academy films)


...Andreas Katsulas
(who played so many great characters, such as G'Kar in Babylon 5)


...Vincent Schiavelli
(who also has played many great characters, such as John O'Connor in The Adventures Of Buckaroo Banzai Across The 8th Dimension)



All dead.


On Vanity And Trackbacks

September 26, 2009

[Note: This is a rant, instead of a triumphant return to blogging. Sorry, Lin.]

Have you ever looked at a blog's comments, only to see lots of comments that are merely quotes of the article, or quotes of another blog talking about the article? Those are trackbacks.

I've never really understood trackbacks. Sure, I get that it's nice to know who's talking about your blog and what they're saying, but do the readers have any interest in that at all? I think trackbacks are pure internet litter for everyone except the blog's author. Shouldn't the blog author(s)/admin(s) be the only one(s) who can see all the trackback junk? And even then, wouldn't it be more useful to have the trackbacks appear as some sort of RSS feed?

And, more existentially, how do the trackbacks even get there? Surely a blog doesn't spider the web for mentions. Do bloggers add trackbacks by hand, then? Or do the popular blogging systems just go and post trackbacks automatically? I don't think I like the implications of automatic trackback posting. Is there some way I can avoid doing that?

Trackbacks should be disabled on this blog. If you ever see one appear, tell me about it, please, because it probably means that I accidentally enabled it in one of my messing-around-with-the-site binges.


Fleeting Desires, Narrow Escape

September 13, 2009

5 seconds ago, I almost deleted this whole blog. On purpose.

Then I didn't.

However, I still want to. I think.

What will the future hold?

...

On second (or maybe fourth) thought, fuck it. No deletion. This blog is still for people who know me well, or those who stumble across it and enjoy it. I briefly flirted with the idea that I wanted to have a nice and respectable and well-manicured blog that I could refer to in sentences like "Hey, you should check out my blog!" or "Oh? I just made a blog post about that. Go check it out!" But I don't actually want to say those sentences. So I think I'm OK.


This pointless post is now complete.


Hollywood Is Inside My Brain

August 29, 2009

Sorry folks, I've got another video for you. This is a trailer for a movie called Hot Tub Time Machine. I can't decide if this is going to suck, or if it's going to be my favorite movie of the year (or maybe even decade). Regardless, I think I'll have to watch it.


Museum Of Animal Perspectives!!!!

August 28, 2009

File this under things I never knew I wanted, but now I can't get enough.


Here's a video from the scorpion cam:




And here's a video from the tarantula cam:




UPDATE: Try MAP's YouTube page instead of the Flickr one. Also, I've now changed the embedded vids to get them working again.


More dancing!

August 16, 2009

In my efforts to transform NOEXTEHO into dance video blog, I present...... this:


You're welcome.

In fact, most of this person's videos are entertaining. For instance, some bass-playing talent:


Youtube, I still love you.

August 09, 2009

Could this video possibly be as awesome as it's title ("Dutch Kids dancing to Hyper Bass!")?


Yes. Yes indeed.

(NOTE: Hyper Bass is now my second favorite musical genre name next to Speedranch. But Google just told me that Speedranch is an artist, not a genre (what?! I could have sworn...), so I guess that means Hyper Bass is my favorite genre name.)


Joe Meets Dubstep

OK, so I've actually known of it for quite a while. (Hell, it was my job at one point to know about it.) But sooooo much of it is sooooooo bland. And that's before you take into account all the lame shit that someone made just because they wanted to jump on the bandwagon. So, for the most part, I've avoided it, except for some random outlier sort-of-dubstep/sort-of-not stuff that's walked right in front of me.


But recently I've had a change of heart. And it's all because of one blog post on Salacious Sound: 3 Dubstep Tracks That Give Me Goosebumps. Not sure how I found it, but that title grabbed me... That's what I need: a small collection of some truly awesome tracks. And that is indeed what they are. If you're at all curious, GO THERE NOW and GET THOSE TRACKS.

That day, I read many other posts on Salacious Sounds, only to learn that it was not actually an "awesome dubstep" blog. Instead, it's a Toronto-centric blog about dance music. But there were a couple other posts with good dubstep-y tracks: Rusko Roots Reggae and Recommended by Jayho. If you're feeling this, then you need to go get those tracks, too.

(Pay attention to this Rusko guy, btw. I know he's already pretty big, but damn... his stuff is usually soooooo damn good.)

Anyways, I got so swept away with this sudden group of actually good dubstep tracks that I went and made a whole radio show (mp3 download on that page) based on them. I probably played everything I just linked to, and then a whole lot more Rusko. But, you see, I mixed them together, a little bit, at least. Like a real DJ. So perhaps you should forgo all the Salacious Sounds links and just check this one out, instead.

Finally, if you know of any other dubstep I should check out, let me know. I need more.


The Perils of Food Porn

August 08, 2009

I can not stop looking at TasteSpotting today. I took it out of my regular blog reading rotation for this very reason. But I've exhausted my regular reading, and (stupidly) decided to revisit TasteSpotting. (I blame Bitten's article yesterday in the NYT - which I read today. It reminded me that awesome foods can be slobbered over on the internet.) Now I have about 20 tabs open, each to a different desirable recipe. And I am sooooooo starving. All I have to look forward to right now is oatmeal. And bananas, too, I suppose.


TasteSpotting really is food porn, as folks call it, but it's sort of worse than 'regular' porn. 'Regular' porn doesn't make me go out and buy things. Food porn does. Either I'm going and buying the ingredients for a recipe (during a trip where I invariable end up buying another $20-$30 of food just because I'm in the mood), or I'm getting a quicker fix and dropping more money than I should on some pre-made gourmet-ish thing. Or sometimes I go nuts and drop $100 at Fairway and then eat that $100 worth of food in a shade under 48 hrs.

Or, perhaps even worse than that, I don't have any money to drop on anything. That's how I am today. My mind is racing, my stomach is pang-ing, and all I have to turn to is my oatmeal (and bananas).


Hot damn, it's a good YouTube day today!

August 07, 2009

Why oh why did I not see this video of Ice-T destroying a Mac laptop the instant it was posted online?!?!



It's been a while since I've posted a good WTF video, right?


After researching the Ig Nobel Prize, I found this:

the Wikipedia page for the Bookseller/Diagram Prize for Oddest Title of the Year


Being the nice guy that I am, I went and found some of the book covers for you.







Been a while since I've loved a music video

But apparently there's a music video for my favorite track off Alva Noto's Unitxt (a truly awesome album! listen to it loud! and make sure you've got bass...):



I Need More Linkblogs

August 04, 2009

As if I don't already read enough of the internet as it is, I want MORE.


Today I realized something... I no longer follow many linkblogs. (By 'linkblog' I mean a blog that pretty much just posts links.) Part of this is because I'm picky. I never really want just a straight link blog that's like LINK, LINK, LINK. I like ones that give about a sentence of context per link.

I used to read Metafilter several years ago (before they re-opened new user accounts), but it always had a bit too many posts per day for me. I would fall behind. And then they opened up new user accounts and all of a sudden the quality fell... so many mindless posts about a "cool" flash game... or a "cool" youtube video. NOT WHAT I WANTED, MeFi. Perhaps it was only a temporary slide, but I didn't stick around to find out, and haven't been able to go back.

I forget what other ones I used to read, but I stopped reading them all for one of two reasons:
  1. There were too many posts per day.
  2. The format changed from 'linkblog' to 'blog.'

Recently, though, I've discovered two nearly perfect linkblogs (for me, at least): Christian Neukirchen's Trivium and the O'Reilly Radar's Four short links. ("Four short links" is just an occasional feature on the O'Reilly Radar, but that's fine for me, since the rest of the Radar is pretty good too.) And to a lesser extent, I'm sort of getting into Grace Smith's roundups (also just an occasional feature), but this might just be because I have yet to find a truly good web design blog.

Now these are good, but not enough! I need more! So, if you're reading this, I suspect you share (or at least know of) my sensibilities. So if you know of any good linkblogs for me, please please please let me know!

(Oh, and I should mention that I am not looking for digg or reddit.)


Oh La Vache!

August 03, 2009

I just noticed a short article on the NYT website about cows. Specifically, about how cows kill about 20 people a year in the U.S. That's about as interesting as that article gets. But it got me thinking about how amusing it is to view cows as dangerous. Sure, you've got the running of the bulls... and bull riding at the rodeo. But that's about it for real danger. Everything else is just sort of like accidental danger.


But my mind is sometimes pretty awesome with making tangent connections. For some reason, this brought to mind a story I read many years ago (possibly about 10 years ago). It was originally posted by a guy named Scott on the Ghost Discuss mailing list (ghost-discuss@aurora.cdb.com) but I found it linked to from somewhere else. It's a bit of a long read (for this blog) but I think it's pretty awesome, so I'm including it below. (And, inexplicably it still freaks me out a bit.)

Once again I am posting something that I've thought about posting ever since I first joined this list. I think you will all realize very quickly why I haven't posted it before this. To this day, even I'm not completely sure what is was that I saw. I know what it looked like, but I've found that it's better, for me at least, not to believe that it really was what it looked like.

This happened years ago. I really don't remember how old I was at the time, but I don't think I was more that about nine years old. That would put the time of this somewhere during the summer of 1984. My Grandparents ( My Mom's parents ) lived out in the country about fifteen minutes drive from home. I was spending the weekend with my Grandparents. The story that follows occoured on the Friday night of that weekend.

It was after dark. I was on the couch, turned around and sitting on my knees, looking out a large picture window. I was waiting on Grandpa to get home from work. Grandma and I were the only two people in the there at the time. As I waited, a dense for began to form. The fog began to grow thicker as time passed. Grandma was getting a bit worried. Grandpa was late getting home and she was afraid he'd have an accident due to low visability brought on by the fog.

Several more minutes passed. I was still kneeling on the couch, watching out the window for Grandpa. Then I saw what looked like two lights coming up the road toward the house. At first, I thought it the lights were from the headlights on Grandpa's car. Then I realized that the lights were not the right color. One light seemed to be a lemon yellow, while the other appeared pink. I watched, curious, as the lights moved closer. Then I yelled for Grandma to come to the window and look at them.

Grandma was busy preparing supper and didn't want to leave the kitchen. I took another look at the lights, which were still moving closer, and then went to the kitchen to try to convince Grandma to come and see them. At this point, the lights were still not much more than fuzzy colored blobs due to the thick fog.

I left the window and ran into the kitchen. I told Grandma that there was a pair of lights approaching the house. She said something along the lines of, "Good. He's finally home." I told her that the lights didn't look like they were from a car. I told her about the odd coloration. Finally, Grandma agreed to go take a look for herself.

Running, I got to the window before Grandma did. I resumed my former kneeling possition on the couch before really looking out the window. The light were still there, closer than before. They were just starting to take on a more deffinate shape, like something was imergeing from the fog.

Grandma leaned forward for a closer look at the solidifying shapes. I turned to her, asking what the lights were. She didn't know and was begining to act a bit scared by the sight. I turned back to the window.

The strange lights were almost to the house by that point. (**Thinking back now, I realize just how bright they must have been to have been visable at the first.** ) Then the lights finally took on a more tangable shape. (**This is the part that REALLY makes me doubt what we THOUGHT we saw**) What we saw looked to be two cows, both bulls, dancing along the road on their hind legs. (**No, this is NOT a joke.**) One was glowing yellow, the other was glowing pink. Each of the "bulls" had a front leg, "arm" draped over the shoulder of the other. They were heading toward the driveway.

At this point, Grandma fainted. I only remember giving her a quick look as she collapsed beside me on the couch, then I resumed staring in disbelief and shock at the sight outside.

The "bulls" danced along until they got to the driveway, turned as if to make their way up it to the house. Then both just faded away.

After some time (**I'm not sure how long exactally, but I don't think it was more than a minute or so**) I turned away from the window to Grandma. She was still unconcious. I had no idea how to revive her. I remember shaking her, as if trying to wake a sleeping person, and talking to her. I do not recall what I said. After a few moments, she began to stir. As Grandma woke up, she turned quickly back to the window. I told her that whatever we had seen was gone. I asked her what HAD we seen.

Grandma sat me down on the couch and told me that I was NOT to breath a word of what had happened to Grandpa when he got home. I asked why. Grandma wouldn't give me an answer. She just kept telling me to keep quiet about it.

A few minutes later, we heard a car door slam outside. Grandpa was home. Again, Grandma warned me not to say a word to Grandpa about what had happened.

Naturally, the moment Grandpa entered the house, I ran straight to him and told him everything that had happened.

Grandpa spared only a second to ask Grandma if she were okay. The moment she said "Yes" Grandpa retieved his shotgun and went outside. Grandma began to scold me, very loudly, for disobeying her orders.

Several minutes later, Grandpa came back in. He had found nothing.

To this day, neither of them will discuss what happened that evening.

If that had been the end of the matter, I would have convinced myself years and years ago that both Grandma and I had simply been hallucinating. In fact, not too long after the incident, I had convinced myself of that.

Several years after seeing the "bulls" at my Grandparents' house, a friend of mine who I grew up with came to me one day with a story. I'll call this girl "A". (**Both she and I were about twelve when she told me this**)

When I lived in Ohio this girl's Grandparents lived directly behind us. "A" lived mostly with her Grandparents during the summer months. Only a one lane alley seperated our two yards. Across this girl's Grandparents' yard was the railroad bed I've posted about a few times in the past. On the other side of the railroad bed was a small farm. (**We lived at the very edge of town**)

"A" came to me one day saying that she had seen something very strange the previous night. I asked her what she'd seen. "A" made a long speach about how I'd think she was crazy if she told me. I pointed out that she'd already brought up the subject, obviously, she wanted to tell me. "A" agreed.

She said that late the night before she had been unable to sleep and had been looking out of her bedroom window. It began to get foggy. In the fog, "A" claimed to have seen two glowing lights moving across the pasture back at the farm. One light was yellow, the other pink.

(**Please keep in mind that I had NOT told anyone about what Grandma and I had seen at this point.**)

"A" said that, as the lights got closer to the railroad bed, they began to take on solid shapes. At that point, I was starting to get cold chills. "A" said that she must have been seeing things and that she wouldn't waste time telling me the rest of her story. I insisted that she did. After a few minutes "A" said, almost in tears, that the lights took on the shapes of cows. Bulls. Each bull had a front leg draped over the shoulders of the other. Both appeared to be dancing along on their hind legs. They were moving toward the railraod bed. Toward "A" 's Grandparents' house.

"A" said that at that point she had turned away from her window and hid under the blankets until morning.

After "A" told me her story, I told her mine own, very similar one. As far as I know, "A" never saw the "bulls" again after that night. I've never seem them again, myself.

If not for "A" 's story, I would long since come to believe that what Grandma and I had seen was a hallucination brought on by the dense fog and car headlights or something like that. "A" 's story makes me think again. I don't know WHAT we saw, but I do know that we saw SOMETHING.

Anyone have any ideas?


Why I Am Still Awake Right Now

August 02, 2009

I can not stop listening to several things:


#1:

Françoise Hardy - On dit de lui

# 2 & 3:
The chilling songs Fearns Foundry - Now I Taste The Tears and The Poppy Family - Shadows On My Wall, both available for download at The Devil's Music.

#4:
Lee Hazlewood & Nancy Sinatra - I've Been Down So Long (It Looks Like Up To Me)

Despite what #2, 3, and 4 might seem to imply, I'm in a good mood. I swear. (Mostly because of finding #1.) BUT I'll be in a better mood if some kind soul passes me an mp3 of that Françoise Hardy song...


The Annual Breakdown

July 29, 2009


I'm weak. I tried so hard to wait to install my AC, perhaps to even go without it all summer. It was pretty warm today, but I didn't mind. Hell, I wasn't even sweating. But then my roommate (who already has her AC in) was cooking something in the oven so the kitchen was insanely hot, and she kept going in and out of her room commenting on how hot it was outside of her room every single time.

So I broke down and put my AC in.

AND I'M SOOOOOOO GLAD I DID! Not employed so far this summer, I had forgotten just how awesome air conditioning can be. Tonight, I will sleep awesomely, under my comforter.

Thank you, thermodynamics. I'm sorry for failing all my courses about you, a few times each.


It's always nice when music still holds up after 30 years.

July 28, 2009


Yeah, this is another post directly from PCL Linkdump. So?


Isn't it ironic?

July 25, 2009






Yes, it's so old and so lame, but I still love extreme ironing.

Also, I really wanted to show off this horrible misuse of "ironic" that just popped into my head.


workinonit

July 23, 2009

If you happen to check here and notice some changes going on during the next week or so, well, don't worry. I'm changing things around, trying things out. Hopefully you don't check too often, or else the final product won't be nearly as exciting and surprising.


And yes, I do hope it will be exciting and surprising.


RSS and the future

July 21, 2009

Lately, I've read multiple articles about how RSS isn't cutting it anymore. Some, like "Fever and the Future of Feed Readers" by Alex Payne, are what I would consider rational commentary. Others (which I refuse to link to) rabidly claim that Twitter bloodily murdered RSS (and Google!) in cold blood and that the world is a better place because of it.


Though, either way - rational or insane - I completely disagree.

RSS has not failed. Aggregators have not failed. We do not need a replacement for RSS. It's the readers who have failed.

I have yet to see any compelling arguments against RSS. Some frequent complaints and my dismissals/solutions follow:
  • too many feeds -- Unsubscribe from some! Or, better yet, don't subscribe to so many in the first place!
  • too much overlap across feeds -- Again, unsubscribe! Only keep the good, unique ones! If you notice that a lot of the overlap is just reblogged from one place, then unsubscribe from the rebloggers and subscribe to the source. (Or if you refuse to unsubscribe, then filter with something like Yahoo's Pipes.)
  • too many posts in each feed -- (you guessed it) UNSUBSCRIBE! Seek alternatives with less posts per day. Most high volume sites are not so unique that there aren't at least 30 alternatives.
  • not real-time enough -- Know this: it's not supposed to be! Do you seriously need it to be real-time anyway? Will the world (or your job, or your relationship, or... anything) end because you see a picture of a cute kitten as late as an hour or two after it was posted on the internet?
  • don't like Google Reader -- Well, you're on your own there. I've tried a lot and believe that Google Reader is the best, so it's kind of all I know. I've heard good things about Helvetireader (a "skin" for Google Reader), Fever (a web-based reader that you install on your own server that costs $30), Times (a slick non-web-based reader for OSX that costs $30), and NetNewsWire and FeedDemon (free, non-web-based readers for OSX and Windows, respectively). BUT I still think Google Reader is better than all of those. Depending on exactly what you don't like about Google Reader, this might be the only valid complaint. But this is a complaint about Google Reader, not RSS.
A lot of people (including Google) think that the future of RSS and the like lays in it becoming more "social." Maybe it does, but it should only be social by choice. Those who want to be anti-social should be allowed to be so. I personally read no RSS feeds which are chosen by popular vote (like Digg or Reddit). I would kill myself if I had to. I am not trying to be condescending (but merely truthful) when I state that my tastes typically do not match those of the general public. This isn't to say that they never match, but I'd rather a site like Buzzfeed or the random personal blogs I read to filter those popular vote sites for me.

Finally, I just want to make this absolutely clear: Twitter will not replace RSS feeds. Also, Twitter searching will not replace Google searching. I'm not slagging Twitter when I make these statements. They can (and will) all coexist peacefully, because they all do different things. (This goes without saying, but I'll say it anyways just in case you've never tried typing more than 140 characters at a time on Twitter. Or just in case you've never tried finding something more than 3 weeks old on Twitter.)


I've Now Got A Supplemental Blog With A Silly Name

July 19, 2009

I wanted to wait a week or two before I posted about it, to make sure I stuck with it, since I have a bad habit of starting blogs and then giving up on them after 1 week or 5 posts, whichever comes first. But posting to this one has already become second nature (thank you, bookmarklets!), and serves a drastically needed function, so I think we're good.


Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you my newest sillily named blog: exphostor

Exphostor, like noexteho before it, stands for something. In this case, it's less cryptic: external photo storage. And this is its function. Instead of downloading images, I can just post them to this tumblr blog. Over the years, I've adopted the policy of downloading any and every image that catches my eye. Nice, because I then have loads of awesome pics on my hard drive. Not so nice because then I need to organize loads of awesome pics, and because it takes up space, and because I rarely go back to them after I've downloaded them. So what if I could just quickly/easily put them online somewhere, like I do with my bookmarks (Delicious)?

After trying out a lot of different places, I finally settled on Tumblr for two reasons. First, when you post a pic via link to tumblr, they make a local copy of it, so it won't disappear when a link becomes broken. Second, as touched on before, they've got a sweet bookmarklet that lets me post exactly how I want. Third, I saw no explicit limit to how much stuff they'll host. (And, as an added bonus, they can handle animated GIFs, a guilty pleasure of mine.)

I want to point out that exphostor is not a blog, per se. Nor does it replace any aspect of this blog. There may be overlap, if I deem something I've posted there worthy of being posted here. It is just a raw feed for my personal use, which you can follow if you really want. I am not posting stuff there specifically for others to see. I am not commenting on the images, except to note the photographer, model, source, and how I heard of it, when applicable and possible. As such, I'm trying only to post things for which I have some sort of relevant information. (Tumblr is already too full of posts with gigantic reblog trees (uggg!) that never actually explain what something is or who's responsible.)

While not a blog, it is still personal. Like my Delicious stream, this is a mostly-unfiltered glance at my interests and my browsing habits. The content may vary wildly. It's not for everyone, and some may find some of the things I post offensive. I will state right now that there will be lots of pictures of "hot women" and occasional nudity. This is something that catches my eye. But, being that I only post what I would consider downloading, I try to make certain that I do not let my primal urges get the better of me. Most, if not all, of the images of "hot women" I post will be honestly good photos, or at least honestly interesting photos. I hope you, too, can appreciate the virtuous aspects of these "hot women" photos and see me for more than just a lecherous creep.

Now, in case you missed the link above, it's exphostor.tumblr.com.


July 16, 2009

Just the other day, I noted that I had Easter and Christmas hymns stuck in my head for no reason at all. So it seems appropriate that I share this slice of awesomeness. (If you have a way to TURN UP YOUR BASS, do it now.)

Who want's the rewind?


A Request To My Reader(s) In Germany

Keep your eyes peeled for vinyl by these guys:




Fuck it: Language Evolution

July 15, 2009

I was originally writing a very long, in-depth post about how language evolves and specific words tend to become de-contextualized over time. But bah. Whatever. Someone who uses/overuses awesome so liberally has no right to complain.


So instead, I'll just briefly (yes, this is brief compared to what I had going before) mention that sexy (when applied to software, cars, mp3 players, etc) really bothers me. I think it's because it's original connotation is so readily apparent. It seems as though the awe in awesome can get somewhat lost. And brilliant hasn't been used to describe light in what now, a few hundred years*? (Not to mention the fact that its French base is obscured by the fact that... it's French.) But the sex in sexy is right there, taking up 3/4 of the entire word. It's unavoidable and hard to overlook. And I've never found a car or mp3 player to be sexually attractive or arousing. Software, on the other hand, could be arousing (see Strip Poker video games), but these are not the pieces of software to which sexy is commonly applied. Grrrrrr.

While I'm complaining like an old man, let me also say that I. HATE. THE. USE. OF. FULL-STOPS. AS. DELIMITERS. FOR. DRAMATIC. EFFECT. Seriously, what's wrong with ellipses?

* I kid. But still...


Wine + Icy Tower = a diversion I didn't need

July 12, 2009

A while ago, I managed to get a free copy of CrossOver (legally). CrossOver lets one run (some) Windows programs on a Mac, without the need to install Windows. Sweet. But for some reason (I think I installed some incompatible version of X11) CrossOver stopped working for me. Not that big a deal, since I really barely used it. And I couldn't get most of the games I wanted to run to work with it anyhow.

For reasons I'm not going to get into right now, I decided to install Wine, the free (and open source) program on which CrossOver is based. I've been quickly trying out various Windows software on it, with some pleasant successes (SciTE, Notepad++, EnviroBear2000, Knytt) and some disappointing, if unsurprising, failures (Spelunky, You Found the Grappling Hook!, La-Mulana). That's the thing about Wine: in my experience, you've got to expect failures, especially from more complex programs... But still, it's free and it works sometimes, so it's cool. And maybe with a little effort, I could get some of the failures working.

My happiest success (so far) was Icy Tower. This is a game I've known of for years, and my love has never wavered... but it's never been ported to OS X, so sometimes I forget it exists. One could describe it as a platform game that distills the genre to its bare essentials: the platforms. A simple concept, but done so elegantly, and with just the right amount of flourishes, as to make this one of my favorite games ever. And they've released a new version since the last time I played it. The new version awesomely added loads of GTA-style achievements/stats. (The graphics might even be better too?) And it works in Wine, so I can easily play it again!


In case you're curious about using Wine on your Mac, I'll give you what advice I can:

(NOTE: Darwine and WineHelper, as described below, are no longer actively developed. Instead, there is just Wine. Still, Mike Kronenberg has released WineBottler, which includes a build of Wine (or maybe Darwine. I'm not sure, and it's not important) inside it, and does most of the same stuff I explain below, and some of it even better than his Darwine build. Soooooo, you might want to check that out instead. I haven't played around with it as much, so I'm not writing about it here. Yet.)

Although the best way to install it would be with a binary from the official site, I couldn't find one there. Instead, there are links to various pages about installing it from source code yourself, but this is rather complicated. So the easiest way it to use binaries that someone else has already compiled, like Mike Kronenberg's build of Darwine that I used. Go ahead, try it out... it's easy. Once it's installed, you just need to open Windows .exe files with WineHelper, and you're good to go.

Mind you, there's a chance you'll need to install X11. Easy enough, since it can be found on your OS X installation disc. (A worthwhile install, in my mind, as it'll also allow you to run the OS X version of The Gimp, a free image editor that is the closest free thing to Photoshop that exists.) There's also a chance that after you install X11, you might need to install XQuartz, a different version of X11, but that's easy enough, too.

Once you've got it running, you can, as I mentioned, open .exe files with WineHelper. Single executable programs (like Knytt) will just run, if they can. Installers (like Icy Tower's) will run, and you can just let them install to their default location. Feel free to let the installers add a link on the desktop, since it's one of the easiest ways to launch applications. You can always move the link into a different location afterwards.

Programs that don't have an installer can either be placed wherever you want, or, keeping it Windows-like, can be placed in the Program Files folder where the installers put stuff. With this build of Darwine, the default folder for this is ~/.wine/drive_c/Program Files/ or, more explicitly, /Users/[INSERT-YOUR-USERNAME-HERE]/.wine/drive_c/Program Files/ so you could create a directory and toss it in there, like I did for Knytt.exe. You're going to want to use either Terminal (type "cd ~/.wine/drive_c/Program\ Files/" and then to get a Finder window, type "open .") or Finder (use Go -> Go To Folder... and then type in the directory name) to get to that folder.

That's about it. Confusing at first, but once you get the hang of it, it's pretty simple.


Obama - Weathers

July 06, 2009


Apt?


July 03, 2009

No real grammar. No real reason. But whatever, this stuff's on my mind today:

1. Drumcorps (the artist) with a superb mix of jungle and hardcore or something like that

2. Venetian Snares doing a dubstep remix of Black Sabbath -- Come on, Chris. If nothing else warms you up to Mr. Snares, this should.

3. Pro tip: Season 4 of Doctor Who is awesome when drunk. Just so long as it's a good drunk. If I were totally lonely and/or heartbroken right now, I'd probably be crying every time he has to make a hard decision.

4. Fourth of July rooftop mini-golf. FUCK YES.

5. I can't believe I'm excited for an HTML specification. HTML/XHTML 5 FTW!

6. SERIOUSLY. Cake-in-a-mug will be the end of me.


and


A Meditation On Hair

July 02, 2009






Oops, I did it again:


My poor nose

Yesterday, my room was full of the smell of gasoline (so much so that I couldn't sleep!). Today, it is full of the smell of deep fryer (so much so that I feel sick!). And even though the gasoline fumes gave me a headache and could have killed me, I prefer them.

Well, Bollywood stars Amitabh Bachchan, Abhishek Bachchan, and Aishwarya Rai Bachchan (formerly the most beautiful woman I've ever seen*) have a message for you, deep fryer smell:


(Damnit. This was kind of a rant, wasn't it? Well, I guess I lied, then, in my previous post.)

* Don't get me wrong - she's still incredibly beautiful.


I love Ruby but...

July 01, 2009

...but I can't stand all the terminology. I've bitched about it before, yes, but I will bitch about it again.


[NOTE: This is a niche rant. My next post will not be a rant. I promise.]

Granted, some of the terminology that trips me up when reading about Ruby is due to the fact that I barely took any computer science classes in college. Also, some phrases, like "continuous integration server" are possibly industry-wide buzzwords, and not necessarily Ruby specific*. This is not really what I'm complaining about today.

What I'm complaining about today is the tendency for a lot of Ruby things to A) have stupid names and B) be based upon other Ruby things with stupid names and in turn be named with even stupider names. First and foremost we have RubyGems (commonly just referred to as gems). RubyGems is a package manager for Ruby that can distribute and manage libraries and programs. OK, fine. Package managers typically have dumb names (see Yum et al), but at least they all call the things they distribute packages. RubyGems (and the Ruby community on a whole) calls them gems. Gah.

Now, allow me to list what some of these gems are named: bishop, hpricot, cucumber, rails, paperclip, webrat, sass, capistrano, sinatra, moonshine, hanna, scruffy, nokogiri, prawn... And the list goes on. Now, I get not wanting to name your gem johns-html-parser or jacks-deployment-utility, but must everything be so whimsical? Must everything be some obscure reference or in-joke? Must everything sound so... Web 2.0?

Alas, it seems as though Ruby's close association with the whole Web 2.0 thing is probably (mostly) to blame. This worries me. I hope that this association does not drag Ruby down once the Web 2.0 trend fades. Ruby is a wonderfully fun language. It brings me back to my childhood when I would hand-enter BASIC programs from magazine articles (remember kids, this was before the world wide web had anything on it), and then subsequently mess around with that code. It brings me back to the days of modifying GORILLA.BAS with a friend to speed it up and make the explosions fill half the screen. It makes me feel like a wide-eyed kid again.

That, too, I suppose, is to blame for the whimsical names.

Finally, I will admit that the computer world has always had a high quantity of confusing and/or stupid names. I personally have typed ls and grep and sudo often enough that I occasionally forget these terms are not common terms that my roommates know. Fortunately, I have not actually completely replaced words in my vocabulary with such computer terms -- like "grep" for "search" -- as some programmers have. Then again, I firmly believe that google can be a verb. In fact, I believe that verb can be a verb. According to the Joe English Dictionary, to verb means making a non-verb into a verb (a process I love).

Perhaps I am simply yelling "Get off my lawn!" while standing upon someone else's lawn?

* Perhaps this silly naming trend is not Ruby specific at all. Do let me know. I guess I mostly read about Ruby, so I wouldn't know. But, thinking back to times when I did read in depth about other languages, I don't recall being so annoyed with the library names.

/* Google Analytics ----------------------------------------------- */